http://api.archives-ouvertes.fr/search/?fq=halId_s:hal-03654704&fl=title_s,en_title_s,docid,label_s,en_label_s,docType_s,authIdHal_s,halId_s,structId_i,uri_s,keyword_s,en_keyword_s,authLastNameFirstName_s,journalTitle_s,abstract_s,en_abstract_s,producedDate_tdate,producedDateY_i,language_s,fileMain_s&sort=publicationDate_s+desc
authors
- Chartier Thomas
- Fagot Joël
keywords
- Backward associations
- Comparative cognition
- Sidman equivalence
- Language
- Anthropocentrism
document type
ART
abstract
Anthropocentrism can bias scientific conclusions. As a case study, we challenge the 40year-old associative symmetry dogma, supposed to cognitively set apart humans from other species. Out of 37 human studies surveyed, only 3 truly demonstrate symmetry, of which only 1 (on 5 participants) suggests that symmetry is spontaneously formed.
more information